![]() ![]() Disruptions within the currents expose deviations on a surface and near-surface level. MPT uses magnetic currents that flow through a tested item. This article will compare both techniques and highlight how to choose the best method for an application. Still, MPT offers distinct conveniences that can capture small and large flaws alike. MPT is a comprehensive solution in its own right, but it doesn’t have the same cutting-edge capabilities as its eddy current counterpart.ĮCT doesn’t require as much preparation as MPT, as operators can apply eddy current techniques with minimal setup and cleanup time. While each technique has its advantages and disadvantages, the eddy current testing method retains the edge. magnetic particle testing (MPT) is an apt comparison because these are two prominent nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques. Aerospace, Oil & Gas, Manufacturing, Transportation or Power Generation Balance of PlantĮddy current testing (ECT) vs.RevospECT® HX Pro: Heat Exchanger Auto Analysis.RevospECT® Pro: Steam Generator Auto Analysis.MIZ®-21C: Affordable and Advanced Handheld. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |